Details of Research Outputs

TitleOptimal Purchasing Policy for Fresh Products from Multiple Supply Sources with Considerations of Random Delivery Times, Risk, and Information
Author (Name in English or Pinyin)
Xu, X.1; Cai, X.2,3; Zhang, L.4
Date Issued2020-04-03
Source PublicationDECISION SCIENCES
ISSN0011-7315
DOI10.1111/deci.12432
Funding Project国家自然科学基金项目
Firstlevel Discipline信息科学与系统科学
Education discipline科技类
Published range国外学术期刊
References
[1] Agrawal, N., & Nahmias, S. (1997). Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Production and Operations Management, 6(3), 291–308.
[2] Burke, G., Carrillo, J., & Vakharia, A. (2007). Single versus multiple supplier sourcing strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 95–112.
[3] Burke, G., Carrillo, J., & Vakharia, A. (2009). Sourcing decisions with stochastic supplier reliability and stochastic demand. Production and Operations Management, 18(4), 475–484.
[4] Buzby, J. C., Bentley, J. T., Padera, B., Campuzano, J., & Ammon, C. (2016). Updated supermarket shrink estimates for fresh foods and their implications for ERS loss-adjusted food availability data. USDA Report. Washington, DC.
[5] Cheon, S., Lee, C. Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Processing time ambiguity and port competitiveness. Production and Operations Management, 26(12), 2187–2206.
[6] Choi, T. M. (2019). Blockchain-technology-supported platforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains. Transportation Research Part E, 128, 17–29.
[7] Choi, T. M., Wen, X., Sun, X., & Chung, S. H. (2019). The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era. Transportation Research Part E, 127, 178–191.
[8] Dada, M., Petruzzi, N. C., & Schwarz, L. B. (2007). A newsvendor's procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(1), 9–32.
[9] Federgruen, A., & Yang, N. (2008). Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Operations Research, 56(4), 916–936.
[10] Federgruen, A., & Yang, N. (2009). Optimal supply diversification under general supply risks. Operations Research, 57(6), 1451–1468.
[11] Feng, Q., & Shi, R. (2012). Sourcing from multiple suppliers for price-dependent demands. Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 547–563.
[12] Goyal, S. K., & Giri, B. C. (2001). Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(1), 1–16.
[13] Henig, M., & Levin, N. (1992). Joint production and product delivery commitments with random yield. Operations Research, 40(2), 404–408.
[14] Hu, B., & Kostamis, D. (2015). Managing supply disruptions when sourcing from reliable and unreliable suppliers. Production and Operations Management, 24(5), 808–820.
[15] Jayaraman, V., Srivastava, R., & Benton, W. C. (1999). Supplier selection and order quantity allocation: A comprehensive model. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(2), 50–58.
[16] Karlin, S., & Rinott, Y. (1981). Univariate and multivariate total positivity, generalized convexity and related inequalities. In S. Schaible & W. Ziemba (Eds.), Generalized concavity in optimization and economics. New York, NY: Academic Press, 703–718.
[17] Kazaz, B. (2004). Production planning under yield and demand uncertainty with yield-dependent cost and price. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 6(3), 209–224.
[18] Kazaz, B., & Webster, S. (2011). The impact of yield-dependent trading costs on pricing and production planning under supply uncertainty. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 13(3), 404–417.
[19] Keren, B. (2009). The single-period inventory problem: Extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega, 37(4), 801–810.
[20] Li, X., Li, Y., & Cai, X. (2012). A note on the random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega, 40(5), 601–610.
[21] Li, X., Li, Y., & Cai, X. (2013). Double marginalization and coordination in the supply chain with uncertain supply. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 228–236.
[22] Minner, S. (2003). Multiple-supplier inventory models in supply chain management: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 81–82, 265–279.
[23] Pal, B., Sana, S., & Chaudhuri, K. (2018). Supply chain coordination with random yield and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 13, 33–44.
[24] Persson, S., Dubaric-Norling, A., & Ringborg, W. (2009). Trade facilitation and maritime transport: The development agenda. Report. Stocklom: Swedish National Board of Trade and Swedish Maritime Administration.
[25] Raafat, F. (1991). Survey of literature on continuously deteriorating inventory model. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42(1), 27–37.
[26] Rosenblatt, M. J., Here, Y. T., & Hefter, I. (1998). Note. An acquisition policy for a single item multi-supplier system. Management Science, 44(11), 96–100.
[27] Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic process. New York, NY: Wiley.
[28] Sirivatanapa, S. (2006). Packaging and transportation of fruits and vegetables for better marketing. Proceedings of Postharvest Management of Fruits and Vegetables in the Asia Pacific Region. Minato City, Tokyo: APO, 43–48.
[29] Tomlin, B. (2009). Impact of supply learning when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 11(2), 192–209.
[30] Xu, M., & Lu, Y. (2013). The effect of supply uncertainty in price-setting newsvendor models. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(3), 423–433.
[31] Xu, H., Zuo, X., & Liu, X. (2015). Configuration of flexibility strategies under supply uncertainty. Omega, 51, 71–82.
[32] Yano, C. A., & Hau, L. (1995). Lot sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research, 43(2), 311–334.
[33] Yao, D., & Zheng, S. (2002). Dynamic control of quality in production-inventory systems: Coordination and optimization. Springer.
[34] Yin, Z., & Ma, S. (2015). Incentives to improve the service level in a random yield supply chain: The role of bonus contracts. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 778–791.
[35] Zhao, M., & Freeman, K. (2019). Robust sourcing from suppliers under ambiguously correlated major disruption risks. Production and Operations Management, 28(2), 441–456.
Citation statistics
Cited Times:7[WOS]   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document TypeJournal article
Identifierhttps://irepository.cuhk.edu.cn/handle/3EPUXD0A/1227
CollectionSchool of Data Science
Corresponding AuthorZhang, L.
Affiliation
1.School of Business, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China
2.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of IoT Intelligent Systems and Wireless Network Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518000, China
3.The Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data, Shenzhen, 518000, China
4.School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Xu, X.,Cai, X.,Zhang, L. Optimal Purchasing Policy for Fresh Products from Multiple Supply Sources with Considerations of Random Delivery Times, Risk, and Information[J]. DECISION SCIENCES,2020.
APA Xu, X., Cai, X., & Zhang, L. (2020). Optimal Purchasing Policy for Fresh Products from Multiple Supply Sources with Considerations of Random Delivery Times, Risk, and Information. DECISION SCIENCES.
MLA Xu, X.,et al."Optimal Purchasing Policy for Fresh Products from Multiple Supply Sources with Considerations of Random Delivery Times, Risk, and Information".DECISION SCIENCES (2020).
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Usage statistics
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Xu, X.]'s Articles
[Cai, X.]'s Articles
[Zhang, L.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Xu, X.]'s Articles
[Cai, X.]'s Articles
[Zhang, L.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Xu, X.]'s Articles
[Cai, X.]'s Articles
[Zhang, L.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.