Details of Research Outputs

TitlePower distance orientation as an antecedent of individuals’ intentions to engage in radical political action
Author (Name in English or Pinyin)
Date Issued2020-12-01
Source PublicationGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Education discipline社科类
Published range国外学术期刊
Volume Issue Pages卷: 23 期: 8 页: 1283-1308
[1] Allan H., Glazzard A., Jesperson S. T., Reddy-Tumu S., Winterbotham E., (2015). Drivers of violent extremism: Hypotheses and literature review. Retrieved from Royal United Services Institute website:
[2] Altemeyer B., (2004). Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 421–447.
[3] Ambrose M. L., Seabright M. A., Schminke M., (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965.
[4] Anicich E. M., Swaab R. I., Galinsky A. D., (2015). Hierarchical cultural values predict success and mortality in high-stakes teams. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1338–1343.
[5] Argomaniz J., Vidal-Diez A., (2015). Examining deterrence and backlash effects in counter-terrorism: The case of ETA. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27, 160–181.
[6] Balch G. I., (1974). Multiple indicators in survey research: The concept “sense of political efficacy.” Political Methodology, 1, 1–43. Retrieved from
[7] Becker J. C., Tausch N., (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 43–92.
[8] Becker J. C., Tausch N., Spears R., Christ O., (2011). Committed dis(s)idents: Participation in radical collective action fosters disidentification with the broader in-group but enhances political identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1104–1116.
[9] Bergeron N., Schneider B. H., (2005). Explaining cross-national differences in peer-directed aggression: A quantitative synthesis. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 31, 116–137.
[10] Boer D., Hanke K., He J., (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 713–734.
[11] Brewer M. B., Yuki M., (Eds.). (2014). Culture and group processes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[12] Brockner J., Ackerman G., Greenberg J., Gelfand M. J., Francesco A. M., Chen Z. X...Shapiro D., (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 300–315.
[13] Bruner J. S., (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[14] Campbell A., Gurin G., Miller W. E., (1954). The voter decides. Oxford, UK: Row, Peterson, and Co.
[15] Cho H. C., Abe S., (2013). Is two-tailed testing for directional research hypotheses tests legitimate? Journal of Business Research, 66, 1261–1266.
[16] Costello A. B., Osborne J. W., (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. Retrieved from
[17] Daniels M. A., Greguras G. J., (2014). Exploring the nature of power distance: Implications for micro- and macro-level theories, processes, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 40, 1202–1229.
[18] Fischer A. H., Roseman I. J., (2007). Beat them or ban them: The characteristics and social functions of anger and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 103–115.
[19] Fischer F. B., Becker J. C., Kito M., Zamantılı Nayır D., (2017). Collective action against sexism in Germany, Turkey, and Japan: The influence of self-construal and face concerns. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 409–423.
[20] Fischer R., Poortinga Y. H., (2018). Addressing methodological challenges in culture-comparative research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49, 691–712.
[21] Freeman J. B., Rule N. O., Ambady N., (2009). The cultural neuroscience of person perception. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 191–201.
[22] Geertz C., (1964). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[23] Gil de Zúñiga H., Diehl T., Ardévol-Abreu A., (2017). Internal, external, and government political efficacy: Effects on news use, discussion, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61, 574–596.
[24] Ha S. E., Kim S., Jo S. H., (2013). Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34, 511–532.
[25] Hofstede G., (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
[26] Hofstede G., (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
[27] Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M., (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
[28] Hsiung H. H., Tsai W. C., (2017). The joint moderating effects of activated negative moods and group voice climate on the relationship between power distance orientation and employee voice behavior. Applied Psychology, 66, 487–514.
[29] Hu L. T., Bentler P. M., (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
[30] Hyun J. I., (2015). What really matters in creating mass mobilization, classical organization, or new social media?: A comparative case study of the mass mobilization process in France and South Korea. Contention, 3, 1–16.
[31] Inglehart R., Basanez M., Diez-Medrano J., Halman L., Luijkx R., (2004). Human beliefs and values: A cross-cultural sourcebook based on the 1999–2002 values surveys. Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
[32] Jorgensen T. D., Pornprasertmanit S., Schoemann A. M., Rosseel Y., (2019). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (R package Version 0.5-2) [Computer software]. Retrieved from
[33] Jost J. T., (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263–314.
[34] Jost J. T., Chaikalis-Petritsis V., Abrams D., Sidanius J., Van der Toorn J., Bratt C., (2012). Why men (and women) do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197–208.
[35] Kay A. C., Jost J. T., (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
[36] Khatri N., (2009). Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations. Vision, 13, 1–9.
[37] Kim U., Helgesen G., Ahn B. M., (2002). Democracy, trust, and political efficacy: Comparative analysis of Danish and Korean political culture. Applied Psychology, 51, 318–353.
[38] Kirkman B. L., Chen G., Farh J. L., Chen Z. X., Lowe K. B., (2009). Individual power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 744–764.
[39] Kish-Gephart J. J., Detert J. R., Klebe Treviño L. K., Edmondson A. C., (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193.
[40] Kitayama S., Markus H. R., (1999). Yin and yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. In Cervone D., Shoda Y., (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 242–302). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
[41] LaFree G., Dugan L., Korte R., (2009). The impact of British counterterrorist strategies on political violence in Northern Ireland: Comparing deterrence and backlash models. Criminology, 47, 17–45.
[42] Lakens D., (2016). One-sided tests: Efficient and underused. Retrieved from
[43] Landau J., (2009). To speak or not to speak: Predictors of voice propensity. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 13, 35–54.
[44] Lee F. L., (2005). Collective efficacy, support for democratization, and political participation in Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 297–317.
[45] Li Y., Sun J. M., (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 172–189.
[46] Lin W., Wang L., Chen S., (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology, 62, 308–329.
[47] Lin X., Chen Z. X., Herman H. M., Wei W., Ma C., (2017). Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The roles of personal sense of power and power distance. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 937–950.
[48] Markus H. R., Kitayama S., (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
[49] Mendonça R. F., Ercan S. A., (2015). Deliberation and protest: Strange bedfellows? Revealing the deliberative potential of 2013 protests in Turkey and Brazil. Policy Studies, 36, 267–282.
[50] Minkenberg M., (2006). Repression and reaction: Militant democracy and the radical right in Germany and France. Patterns of Prejudice, 40, 25–44.
[51] Moeller J., de Vreese C., Esser F., Kunz R., (2014). Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 689–700.
[52] Moon C., Travaglino G. A., Uskul A. K., (2018). Social value orientation and endorsement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism: An exploratory study comparing individuals from North America and South Korea. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
[53] Moon C., Weick M., Uskul A. K., (2018). Cultural variation in individuals’ responses to incivility by perpetrators of different rank: The mediating role of descriptive and injunctive norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 472–489.
[54] Napier J. L., Jost J. T., (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.
[55] Niemi R. G., Craig S. C., Mattei F., (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413.
[56] Opp K. D., (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique and synthesis. New York, NY: Routledge.
[57] Osborne D., Sibley C. G., (2017). Identifying “types” of ideologies and intergroup biases: Advancing a person-centred approach to social psychology. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 288–332.
[58] Oyserman D., (2011). Culture as situated cognition: Cultural mindsets, cultural fluency, and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology, 22, 164–214.
[59] Oyserman D., (2016). What does a priming perspective reveal about culture?: Culture-as-situated-cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 94–99.
[60] Oyserman D., Lee S. W., (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.
[61] Oyserman D., Uskul A. K., (2008). Individualism and collectivism: Societal-level processes with implications for individual-level and society-level outcomes. In van de Vijver F., van Hemert D., Poortinga Y., (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 145–173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[62] Pettigrew T. F., Hewstone M., (2017). The single factor fallacy: Implications of missing critical variables from an analysis of intergroup contact theory. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11, 8–37.
[63] Pratto F., Cidam A., Stewart A. L., Zeineddine F. B., Aranda M., Aiello A...Eicher V., (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 587–599.
[64] Pratto F., Liu J. H., Levin S., Sidanius J., Shih M., Bachrach H., Hegarty P., (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
[65] Pridemore W. A., Freilich J. D., (2007). The impact of state laws protecting abortion clinics and reproductive rights on crimes against abortion providers: Deterrence, backlash, or neither? Law and Human Behavior, 31, 611–627.
[66] Ravndal J. A., (2018). Explaining right-wing terrorism and violence in Western Europe: Grievances, opportunities and polarisation. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 845–866.
[67] Rosseel Y., (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.
[68] Rothmund T., Becker J. C., Jost J. T., (2016). The psychology of social justice in political thought and action. In Sabbagh C., Schmitt M., (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 275–291). New York, NY: Springer.
[69] Schaerer M., Lee A. J., Galinsky A. D., Thau S., (2018). Contextualizing social power research within organizational behavior. In Ferris D. L., Johnson R. E., Sedikides C., (Eds.), The self at work: Fundamental theory and research (pp. 194–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
[70] Schermelleh-Engel K., Moosbrugger H., Muller H., (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
[71] Schwartz S. H., (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology, 48, 23–47.
[72] Shao R., Rupp D. E., Skarlicki D. P., Jones K. S., (2013). Employee justice across cultures: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 39, 263–301.
[73] Sherkat D. E., Blocker T. J., (1994). The political development of sixties’ activists: Identifying the influence of class, gender, and socialization on protest participation. Social Forces, 72, 821–842.
[74] Shuman E., Cohen-Chen S., Hirsch-Hoefler S., Halperin E., (2016). Explaining normative versus nonnormative action: The role of implicit theories. Political Psychology, 37, 835–852.
[75] Solak N., Jost J. T., Sümer N., Clore G. L., (2012). Rage against the machine: The case for system-level emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 674–690.
[76] Soper D. S., (2019). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models. Retrieved from
[77] Stangor C., Jost J. T., (1997). Individual, group, and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations. In Spears R., Oakes P., Ellemers N., Haslam S. A., (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 336–358). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
[78] Strelan P., Weick M., Vasiljevic M., (2014). Power and revenge. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 521–540.
[79] Taras V., Steel P., Kirkman B. L., (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56, 455–487.
[80] Tausch N., Becker J. C., Spears R., Christ O., Saab R., Singh P., Siddiqui R. N., (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 129–148.
[81] The Economist. (2018, December 22). The Economist’s country of the year 2018. Retrieved from
[82] Travaglino G. A., (2017). Support for Anonymous as vicarious dissent: Testing the social banditry framework. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication.
[83] Travaglino G. A., Abrams D., (2019). How criminal organisations exert secret power over communities: An intracultural appropriation theory of cultural values and norms. European Review of Social Psychology, 30, 74–122.
[84] Travaglino G. A., Abrams D., Russo G., (2017). Dual routes from social identity to collective opposition to criminal organisations: Intracultural appropriation theory and the roles of honour codes and social change beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 317–332.
[85] Travaglino G. A., Drury L., (2019). Connected guys: Endorsement of masculine honour predicts more frequent contact with members of criminal organisations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 157–168.
[86] Triandis H. C., (2001). Individualism–collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924.
[87] Triandis H. C., Bontempo R., Villareal M. J., Asai M., Laccu N., (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self–ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
[88] Valentino N. A., Gregorowicz K., Groenendyk E. W., (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31, 307–330.
[89] Van de Vijver F. J., Leung K., (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 33–51.
[90] Van de Vliert E., Schwartz S. H., Huismans S. E., Hofstede G., Daan S., (1999). Temperature, cultural masculinity, and domestic political violence: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 291–314.
[91] Van den Bos K., (2018). Why people radicalize: How unfairness judgments are used to fuel radical beliefs, extremist behaviors, and terrorism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[92] Van den Bos K., Brockner J., Van den Oudenalder M., Kamble S. V., Nasabi A., (2013). Delineating a method to study cross-cultural differences with experimental control: The voice effect and countercultural contexts regarding power distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 624–634.
[93] Van Deth J. W., (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49, 349–367.
[94] Van Zomeren M., (2016). Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating core motivations and features of social structure into the political psychology of political action. Political Psychology, 37, 87–114.
[95] Van Zomeren M., (2019). Toward a cultural psychology of collective action: Just how “core” are the core motivations for collective action? Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13.
[96] Van Zomeren M., Leach C. W., Spears R., (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199.
[97] Van Zomeren M., Louis W. R., (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 277–284.
[98] Van Zomeren M., Saguy T., Schellhaas F. M., (2013). Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 618–634.
[99] Van Zomeren M., Spears R., Fischer A. H., Leach C. W., (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
[100] Walker I., Smith H. J., (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[101] Wallace B. C., Dahabreh I. J., Trikalinos T. A., Lau J., Trow P., Schmid C. H., (2012). Closing the gap between methodologists and end-users: R as a computational back-end. Journal of Statistical Software, 49, 1–15.
[102] Warren D. E., (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28, 622–632.
[103] Wei X., Zhang Z.-X., Chen X.-P., (2015). I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: A moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1641–1652.
[104] Weick M., Vasiljevic M., Uskul A. K., Moon C., (2017). Stuck in the heat or stuck in the hierarchy? Power relations explain regional variations in violence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40.
[105] Westland J. C., (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 476–487.
[106] Winterich K. P., Zhang Y., (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41, 274–293.
[107] Yoo B., Donthu N., Lenartowicz T., (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23, 193–210.
Citation statistics
Cited Times [WOS]:0   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionSchool of Humanities and Social Science
Corresponding AuthorTravaglino, G.A.
1.The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), China
2.University of Kent, UK3Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom
3.Leeds Beckett University, United Kingdom
First Author AffilicationThe Chinese University of HongKong,Shenzhen
Corresponding Author AffilicationThe Chinese University of HongKong,Shenzhen
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Travaglino, G.A.,Moon, C. Power distance orientation as an antecedent of individuals’ intentions to engage in radical political action[J]. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,2020.
APA Travaglino, G.A., & Moon, C. (2020). Power distance orientation as an antecedent of individuals’ intentions to engage in radical political action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
MLA Travaglino, G.A.,et al."Power distance orientation as an antecedent of individuals’ intentions to engage in radical political action".Group Processes and Intergroup Relations (2020).
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Usage statistics
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Travaglino, G.A.]'s Articles
[Moon, C.]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Travaglino, G.A.]'s Articles
[Moon, C.]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Travaglino, G.A.]'s Articles
[Moon, C.]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.